![]() |
| WORLD CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE | |
|
26 June - 1 July 1999, Budapest, Hungary |
|
The Conference was organised by UNESCO
(one of the specialised agencies of UN with its headquarters located
in Paris) and ICSU - the International Council of Scientific Unions
- established in 1931 in Brussels as an international non-governmental
and non-profit scientific organisation (with its quarters located also
in Paris). In 1998 ICSU changed its name to the International Council
for Science, but it kept its well-known acronym ICSU and the logo.
ICSU’s membership comprises 95 multidisciplinary national bodies, scientific
research councils or national science academies and 25 International
Scientific Unions. It is the world’s most prestigious international
scientific organisation,
and, therefore, for the past several years IUPESM has been trying to
achieve the status of a full membership, although it has already been
among the 28 Scientific Associates. The organisers have invited two
representatives from IUPESM to attend the Conference. Mostly due to
geographical reasons these representatives were Mr Nandor Richter of
Hungary, Founding Member of the World Academy of Biomedical Technology
(an UNESCO based organisation) and Past Vice-President of IUPESM (1988-1991),
and Oskar A. Chomicki of Poland, Vice-President of IOMP. All the plenary sessions of the World
Conference were held in the Budapest Convention Centre, others at various
other buildings. Over 2,500
participants attended the Conference from all over the world (delegations
from 142 countries numbered between 1 to 30 persons). The participants
were provided with free lunches, telephone cards and were allowed to
travel in Budapest by public transport free of charge. The main topics of the Conference,
called Forums, were (1) Science: Achievements, Shortcomings and Challenges,
(2) Science and Society, and (3) Towards a New Commitment. For the IUPESM representatives the
most important meeting was that of the Non-Governmental Organisations
Consultation held on June 27-28 at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
For us
the only way to submit recommendation for inclusion in the Declaration
and the Frame of Actions was at the NGO meeting. The revised draft documents,
presented by the rapporteur were accepted by consensus at the closing
session of the conference. Time for discussion was not available. One of IUPESM representatives (Oskar Chomicki) was allowed 15 minutes
to present the structure and activities of the IUPESM before a group
of some 30 delegates of 29 NGO
organisations, and both representatives submitted the following new
paragraph to the NGO recommendation: “ Health related sciences - medical
sciences and health related technological sciences, such as medical
physics and biomedical engineering are of the greatest importance as
a response to human needs. A balanced development and application of
these sciences are key factors in health improvement the world over.
Emphasis should be put on preventive health technologies with particular
reference to the existing needs in developing countries. Governments
and international organisations should increasingly rely upon the experience
in this field [gained] by some international organisations such as IUPESM” This paragraph was subsequently
edited by NGO rapporteurs, and in the version given below was included
in a set of six draft recommendations presented by the NGO to the General
Meeting: “Health related sciences are of
the greatest importance as a response to human needs. A balanced development
and application of these sciences, to be inclusive of all groups, are
key factors in health improvement the world over. Emphasis should
be put on preventive health technologies with particular reference to
the existing needs. Governments and international organisations
should increasingly rely upon the experience in this field of the relevant
international scientific organisations and relevant NGO”. It can easily be seen that two vital
points in the IUPESM paragraph were, unfortunately, omitted, namely
those of “medical physics and biomedical engineering” and “such
as IUPESM”. Nevertheless, although the final draft version of the
“DECLARATION ON SCIENCE AND THE USE OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE”, the most
important document issued at the Conference, did not retain the above
formulation it had one sentence in the Preamble, which vaguely resembled
the suggestion made by the IUPESM representatives. It read: “We seek
collaboration across all the fields of scientific endeavour, i.e. the
natural sciences such as the physical, earth and biological sciences,
the biomedical and engineering sciences...” These documents
can be downloaded from the website: http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs One may say that it is better to have
something than nothing... What should be emphasised is that the Conference
in its toto did not concern itself much with bio-medicine, and,
for example, apart from the above few words, the Declaration did not
mention any medical problems at all. Just to show the atmosphere and
the philosophy of the conference we include a few sentences from the
opening speech of Prof. Arber, President of ICSU: “ The represented disciplines englobe
all of natural sciences and range from mathematics and astronomy to
specialized fields of the life sciences and include of course physics,
chemistry and the earth sciences. Please note that this roughly corresponds
to the definition given to science in the context of our World Conference
on Science. Most of what is commonly understood under humanities, social
sciences, clinical medicine and engineering is thus not part of our
debate on science per se, although some important segment of these fields
of knowledge are essential in the evaluation of the impact of science
and its application on society”. The organisers and participants,
since they wanted to gain respect for science, and/or make it more popular
in their respective societies, especially in the
Developing Countries, and wanted to introduce science into the 21st
century in all countries the world over, were mostly interested in general
problems concerning humankind such as poverty (with suggestions by the
representatives of some African countries that part of their debts be
transformed into financial assistance for research), or the historical imbalance in the participation
of men and women in all science-related activities, or ethics in scientific endeavour. There were
also some rather unusual recommendations like those put forward by one
of the founders of the Indian Green Revolution who suggested that poverty
should be eliminated by introducing Internet to Indian villages; he
himself initiated this programme in 20 small villages with an annual
income of $ 25! Among the most important 28 conclusions
drawn and adopted were those which proclaimed the importance of
(1) Science for knowledge; knowledge for progress, (2) Science
for peace, (3) Science for development, and (4) Science in society and
science for society. Several
dozen researchers and scientific organisers spent several dozen hours
on formulating these points
in detail with the aim of presenting them to the respective governmental
bodies and NGO organisations for implementation. The general feeling was that in practice
the World Conference on Science would not be able to change dramatically the world’s current situation
in science, especially in the
emerging and developing countries, mostly because of the widespread
shortage in financial resources which, as everybody pointed out, are
absolutely indispensable for research and scientific education. Both
UNESCO and ICSU were very clear in this respect: no big money may be
forthcoming from these two organisations. This statement may have a
bearing on the IUPESM’s hopes for financial assistance in the future.
Higher status and wider recognition on the part of the scientific community
are two most important benefits to be gained from joining ICSU. Oskar A. Chomicki and Nandor Richter– IUPESM
representatives to the World Science Congress |
|
Copyright © 1999, IUPESM/IFMBE Updates to information should be sent to Secretary General Direct website issues to webmaster@iupesm.org |